You really do not need to show the targets break. But if you must, the best view would be behind the shooter which helps you see the shooters moves and the targets. Like the ISSF world cup skeet videos. Or you could do a split view with one camera high behind station 4 showing the target break zone and one camera in front of the shooter showing a close up of the shooter. Not too close please - show the shooter fully from shoe to hat. Many of us like to analyze their technique.
I watched the skeet finals. The editing was confusing; too many cameras and most of the action happened during the camera change. It was really hard to see what happened. Just as the shooter was about to mount the gun the camera either switched to show the target flying and breaking, or switched to wide angle shot from a far showing the shooters and audience making the shooter "disappear into the image". Both views made it hard to see what happened.
you no have any idea about this sport, many cameras used very bad. good animations but usable only in post-prouction. Conclusion the final is not understandable specially for the new spectators.
Comments
Slow motion was a nice touch.
Just as the shooter was about to mount the gun the camera either switched to show the target flying and breaking, or switched to wide angle shot from a far showing the shooters and audience making the shooter "disappear into the image". Both views made it hard to see what happened.
good animations but usable only in post-prouction.
Conclusion the final is not understandable specially for the new spectators.
Paolo